Changes in admissions, and hospitalization outcomes of IBD patients in an Italian tertiary referral center over a 13-year period.

OBJECTIVE: The management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) has changed significantly in recent years, mainly due to the introduction of biologic medications, however, other factors may also have a role. The aim of this study was to evaluate the evolution of IBD admissions, including trends, modality of admission and rates of surgical intervention, in a tertiary care center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Hospitalization of patients with a diagnosis of Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) were identified between 2000 and 2013, using ICD-9-CM codes for IBD, from our hospital database. The following parameters were evaluated for each admission: type of admission (ordinary vs. day care service), mode of admission (elective vs. emergency care, for ordinary admissions only), admission code, surgical procedures and complication rates. Comparison between pre- and post-biologic therapy introduction years was also performed. RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2013 a total of 8834 IBD-related admissions were recorded. Hospitalizations increased linearly reaching a peak in 2006, with a downward trend in the following years. The downward trend was especially marked for patients younger than 40 years. No significant differences in hospitalization trends between CD and UC were recorded. Disease flare represented the cause of hospitalization in approximately 50% of cases. Overall, 10.8% of patients underwent surgery with no difference between the two conditions. Complications occurred in 28.7% of admissions. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalizations for IBD patients have decreased in recent years, especially in younger patients. However, a significant proportion of patients are still admitted to complete diagnostic workup, indicating the need to better implement outpatient services. A clear reduction in surgery occurrence over time could not be observed in our study.

A Risk Assessment of Factors for the Presence of Angiodysplasias During Endoscopy and Factors Contributing to Symptomatic Bleeding and Rebleeds.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have assessed factors associated with angiodysplasias during endoscopy or factors associated with symptomatic disease. AIMS: To evaluate risk factors for the presence of and contribution to symptomatic disease in patients with angiodysplasias. METHODS: We performed a systematic MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library search according to the PRISMA guidelines for studies assessing risk factors involved in angiodysplasias detected during endoscopy and factors that lead to anemia or overt bleeding. Study quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. A risk assessment was performed by selecting risk factors identified by two independent studies and/or by a large effect size. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies involving 92,634 participants were included. The overall quality of the evidence was moderate. Risk factors for the diagnosis of angiodysplasias during endoscopy confirmed by at least two studies were increasing age (OR 1.09 per year, 95% CI 1.04-1.1), chronic kidney disease (OR 4.5, 95% CI 1.9-10.5) and cardiovascular disease (2.9, 95% CI 1.4-6.2). The risk of rebleeds was higher in the presence of multiple lesions (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.1-16.2 and 3.8, 95% CI 1.3-11.3 and 8.6, 95% CI 1.4-52.6), liver cirrhosis (OR 4.0, 95% 1.1-15.0) and prothrombin time < 30% (OR 4.2, 95% 1.1-15.4) with a moderate effect size. Multiple comorbidities were associated with an increased in-hospital mortality (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.2-4.3). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review identified age, chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular disease as the most important risk factors for the diagnosis of angiodysplasias during endoscopy. Multiple lesions increase the risk of recurrent bleeding.

Fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of patients with ulcerative colitis and other gastrointestinal conditions beyond Clostridium difficile infection: an update.

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is the transplantation of microbial gut contents from a healthy individual into the gastrointestinal tract of a person with a disease, with a view to increasing the recipient's gut microbial diversity and bacterial richness and restoring microbial homeostasis. FMT has been proven to be a safe and effective treatment for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and it is now a recommended treatment for recurrent or refractory infection. FMT is not currently recommended for use outside of CDI due to concerns regarding outcome and safety; however, several case series and randomized controlled trials have described its use in a research environment for a few gastrointestinal conditions related to intestinal dysbiosis including ulcerative colitis (UC), Crohn's disease (CD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The most successful reports of the clinical efficacy of FMT in gastrointestinal conditions outside of CDI have been in treating UC. We summarize the current literature regarding the use of FMT in UC, including methodology, clinical efficacy and safety concerns, and identify pitfalls and areas for future development. We also describe the available evidence to date on the use of FMT in CD, IBS and other conditions related to intestinal dysbiosi.

Primary neoplasms of the small bowel at CT: a pictorial essay for the clinician.

OBJECTIVE: Primary small intestinal neoplasms are uncommon tumors that are often small and difficult to identify. The aim of this paper is to describe CT technique and features in detecting and characterizing the tumors of the small bowel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This paper focuses on radiological characteristics of benign and malignant primary neoplasms of the small bowel at CT, with special reference to multidetector-CT techniques, type and modality of administration of contrast agents (by oral route or CT-enterography and by nasojejunal tube or CT-enteroclysis). This paper will also provide pictures and description of CT findings of benign and malignant primary neoplasms using examples of CT-enterography and CT-enteroclysis. RESULTS: Among CT modalities, CT-enterography has the advantage of defining the real extension of wall lesions, possible transmural extension, the degree of mesenteric involvement and remote metastasis. Other useful modalities for the diagnosis of such lesions like capsule endoscopy and enteroscopy, provide important information but limited to mucosal changes with lower accuracy on extension and bowel wall involvement or submucosal lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Multidetector-CT, performed after distension of the small bowel with oral contrast material and intravenous injection of iodinated contrast material, is a useful method for the diagnosis and staging of small bowel neoplasms.

The Role and Regulation of the 11 Beta-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Enzyme System in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Glucocorticoids are known to modulate a number of immunological responses including counteracting inflammation. Within tissues expressing the glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptors including the colon, glucocorticoid metabolism is regulated by the isoenzymes of 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11ß-HSD). 11ß-HSD1 acts as an oxidoreductase converting inactive cortisone into active cortisol, while 11ß-HSD2 acts as a dehydrogenase converting active cortisol to inactive cortisone. Hexose-6 phosphate dehydrogenase (H6PDH) is a key regulator of 11ß-HSD1 activity via its generation of NADPH. Variations in the 11ß-HSD enzyme system in relation to levels of expression and regulation may have a role in IBD. The aim of this study was to investigate possible abnormalities of 11ß-HSD enzyme system in the colon of patients with IBD. METHODS: By using quantitative real-time PCR, we investigated the transcription levels of 11ß-HSD1 and 2 in colonic tissue from IBD patients and healthy controls undergoing a colonoscopy for disease assessment. Disease activity was recorded using clinical (Mayo Score/Harvey-Bradshaw Index), Biochemical (C-reactive protein), histological, and endoscopic parameters. In addition, transcription levels of H6PDH and the glucocorticoid receptor alpha (GR-α) as well as key pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1ß, IL-6, Rela (subunit for NF Kappa B)) were later examined among this group, and results were correlated with 11ß-HSD2 gene expression. Results and patient demographics were expressed as a mean (and SD), and differences between IBD patients and control groups were analyzed using a Student's t test or Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate, with a p value of ≤0.05 considered significant. Results were controlled for disease activity as outlined above. RESULTS: Results have demonstrated a significant downregulation in 11ß-HSD2 expression in IBD patients compared with controls (13.8 ± 17.1 au vs. 318.4 ± 521.1 au, p = 0.01), whereas levels of 11ß-HSD1 did not appear to vary across the two groups. Among IBD patients, there was a trend toward higher 11ß-HSD1 expression in inflamed tissue compared with matched non-inflamed tissue (422.1 ± 944 au vs. 102.2 ± 103.9, P = 0.09). Levels of H6PDH and the GR-α expression did not appear to vary among active inflamed IBD tissue and controls. As a result, we examined the association between pro-inflammatory cytokines and levels of 11ß-HSD2 expression. Results showed an upregulation of key pro-inflammatory cytokine mRNA expression (TNF-α, IL-1ß, IL-6) during inflammation with an associated downregulation of 11ß-HSD2 mRNA expression when compared to controls. Dysregulation in this pathway could have a potential role in IBD pathogenesis and may account for exogenous glucocorticoid resistance in IBD. Further work assessing the role of the 11ß-HSD enzyme system in steroid-resistant subjects is warranted.

Double-balloon enteroscopy in Ireland in the capsule endoscopy era.

BACKGROUND: The availability of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) and small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) in Ireland has revolutionised our approach to the diagnosis and treatment of small bowel disorders. AIMS: To evaluate the use of DBE in Ireland and to compare the diagnostic yield with and without prior SBCE in order to improve the efficiency of our resources for small bowel endoscopy. METHODS: A retrospective comparison study of all DBEs performed between two centres, one with SBCE available, was undertaken. Information was obtained by review of endoscopy reports, referral letters, radiology reports and charts. A review of the SBCE database was undertaken to identify patients who had undergone SBCE prior to DBE. RESULTS: A total of 242 DBE procedures were carried out between both centres. SBCE was performed prior to DBE in 20 % (n = 46). The overall diagnostic yield of DBE was 47 % (n = 115). There was a statistically significant difference in diagnostic yield between the DBE only and the DBE with prior SBCE groups 44 versus 61 %, respectively, p < 0.0001. There was also a significant difference in the DBE approach, with 73 % of procedures being anterograde in centre 1 versus 56 % in centre 2. A subgroup analysis of centre 1 data revealed a negative predictive value of 100 % and a positive predictive value of 74 % for SBCE when DBE findings were considered as a gold standard. CONCLUSION: SBCE as a screening tool prior to DBE is extremely valuable and increases the diagnostic yield considerably as a consequence of a high negative predictive value.